adagazetesi com

Civil-Military Relations: Theoretical Explanation
Girotra Vinay?
Civil-military relations generally refer to the interactions between armed forces as institutions and the society they belong to. In terms of general definition, the democratic civil-military relations stand for the efficient management of security based on the principles of democracy as well as of the governmental agencies associated with the above mentioned field. Developed states, with a few exceptions have been able to maintain democratic civil-military relations, a system where civilian elites have the power of final decision making. However many third world states have failed to maintain civilian supremacy for longer periods. In these states, the military constitutes the most obvious power base. It is a force to reckon with more at home than abroad and is used widely by civilian and military elites to strengthen their position. Scholars and academicians all over the world have provided many theories which suggest the different ways by which democratic civil-military relations have been maintained in developed states and can also be applied in third world states for bringing civilian supremacy. Classical liberal thinkers like Huntington, Finer & Janowitz and modern democratic thinkers like Feaver & Schiff are the most prominent ones.
Huntington’s Liberal Approach: Civilian Control through professionalism
Liberal theory argues that the first priority of a democratic state is to protect the rights and liberties of individual citizens. This can be achieved by a social contract in which rule of law is supreme and all the citizens are bound by this contract. However, state has also to deal with those outside the community who are not party or bound by the contract. In the international arena, there is still a state of nature in which conflict is uncontrolled. To retain its authority, the state must protect its citizens from these foreign threats, not least of all by means of an effective military establishment. It is crucial that the military be strong to protect the state in a conflict ridden world. Yet the military can not be left uncontrolled by the state. Free from state restraints, the military would pursue the objects of its own passions and pose an internal threat to sovereign power. Neither can the military be wholly dominated by the state-especially not a democratic state representative of civilian society-because then the military would be forced to follow the passions of the civilian elites controlling the state, and following these passions might sap military strength by distracting it from its purpose. 
Samuel P. Huntington attempts to solve the dilemma by providing his theory of civilian control through professionalism. He has provided his model of “Objective Civilian Control” in which Civilian control is maintained through entrusting ‘professionalism’ in military corps. Civilians are entitled to dictate military security policy, but would leave the military elites free to determine what military operations were required to secure the policy objectives. The essence of objective civilian control is the recognition of autonomous military professionalism and independent military sphere. 
Huntington distinguishes between a profession and other occupations by the presence of expertise and responsibility. Professionalism in armed forces sets definite limits to military political power without reference to the distribution to political power among the various civilian groups. A highly professional officer corps stands ready to carry out the wishes of any civilian group which secures legitimate authority within the state. Huntington argues that a high degree of civilian control can be achieved in the modern state only by a high degree of differentiation of military institutions from other social institutions and the creation of a thoroughly professional officer corps. A professional officer corps, he argues, is jealous of its own limited sphere of competence but recognizes its incompetence in matters that lie outside the professional military sphere and hence is willing to accept its role as a subordinate instrument of the state. The less professionalized the officer corps, on the other hand, the less differentiation there is between military and political roles and therefore the less justification for military obedience to political authority. 
Many scholars have disputed this classical liberal theory that professionalism ensures the insulation of military from politics. Samuel E. Finer believes that professionalism infact could thrust the military into collision with civilian authorities, as military elites may see themselves as the servants of the state rather than of the government and also that armed forces may fall prey to ‘military syndicalism,’ the idea that as specialists only they have the qualification to make decision about defense. Abrahamson argues that excessive professionalism creates a powerful, military-social structure. In this structure, if there are differences between civilian and military values and objectives, civilian control over the military will be impaired. However, Huntington believes that professionalism entails the reorientation of the armed forces toward their rightful (external) missions, the elimination of overstaffing and non-military responsibilities and the conferring on the armed forces the status and the respect they deserve. 
Janowitz’s Approach: Civilian control through Societal Control
Practical experiences suggest that too many armed forces that were deemed professional, not only by their own standards but also by external evaluation, have engaged in various endeavors of subverting civilian authority, including coups d’état. This is one major reason why the second chief protagonist in the debate of civil-military relations, Morris Janowitz understood civilian control in terms of societal control rather than state or institutional control. State or institutes play a secondary role as an extension of society, but “societal control measured in part as integration with society, was Janowitz’s normative and empirical focus.” He links the military intervention with internal characteristics of the military such as mission cohesiveness, skill, recruitment, organizational pattern and hierarchical structure. He believed that a military with ‘internally oriented mission,’ for instance was more likely to get involved in internal politics than a military with clear external role and orientation. 
Janowitz believed that the main issue after World War-II was how to preserve the ideal of the citizen-soldier in an era when the changing nature of war no longer required mass participation in military service but did require the state to maintain a large standing force of professional soldiers. To this end, he argued for an explicit program in political education to connect professional military training to national and transnational purposes. He observed that changes in technology, society and mission had led to an inevitably more political role for the professional soldier than that suggested by Huntington. Janowitz contended that it was the professional socialization of the military through its relationship with and sympathy for the values of the society it serves that ensures civilian control over the armed forces. Where Huntington offers a static ideal type, Janowitz posits a dynamic professionalism changing with different sociological conditions. Janowitz admits of a politically aware officer corps with overlapping functions and expertise with civilian counterparts. Janowitz expands Huntington’s professional ethic to include “a sense of self esteem and moral worth,” but he still relies on it to secure civilian control. 

Corporatism: Civilian control with limited military autonomy in economic sphere
Military corporatism is a modified form of military professionalism. A typical ‘corporate’ model of civil-military relations ascribes high value to military strength and expertise just like classical liberal model of professionalism. Unlike ‘professional’ model, the civil authorities have an obligation to tolerate the autonomous development of the military’s influence within the sphere of its corporate interests. The military elites in turn have to obey the civilian ones, because it is their duty to do so. It briefly means that military as a modern organization is collectively very professional and military elites have the capacity to influence political policies for organizational interests. In other words, it does not imply political neutrality that Huntington implies in his discussion of professionalism. Rather it implies an enlarged political role.
Eric A. Nordlinger argues that every public institution, whether it be the civil service, the legislature, the executive branch, the judiciary, the policy or even the armed forces is much concerned with the protection and enhancement of its own interests. These institutions perceive their interests in broadly similar ways. They all share an interest in adequate budgetary support autonomy in managing their internal affairs, the preservation of their responsibilities in the face of encroachments from the rival institutions, and the continuity of the institution itself. Civilian refusals to satisfy budgetary interests do not always engender strong interventionist motives. Interference in the internal matters of military almost invariably does so. Even minor trespasses upon the military reservation may be seen as attack on its corporate interests. Military autonomy excludes civilian government in shaping the educational and training curriculum, the assignment of officers to particular posts, the promotion of all but the most senior officers, and the formulation of defense strategies. Autonomy clearly excludes any

On the 17 of June, 1942, G.I. Joe was debuted as a Yankee cartoon soldier made by David Breger in the military’s YANK mag. GI Joe, became a American household name with the release of a picture the story of G.I. Toy business was the driver following the commercialization of GI Joe brand. As an example, The milliatray actions figures from the Hasbro toy company included members from every one of the four branches of the armed forces ; Action soldier, Action Pilot, Action Sailor and Action sea.

The story of of the military action figure started with an American cartoon soldier made in 1942 and began a considerable industry over some years. GI Joe military action figures have galvanized many young Yank to serve thier country and protect the state. The tenth annual convention was in New Orleans 2006 with Sgt. Massacre in attendance as a special guest. The sensation of GI Joe story is both a commercial success and the proof of American heroism. Actually, many up to date G.I. Joe action figures are based primarily on both army and civilian real-life heroes – Bob Hope, Dwight Eisenhower, Colin Powell, John F. Kennedy, Ernie Pyle, Theodore Roosevelt and George Washington.

The story of GI Joe has been influenced by each combat that the U. has been concerned. Even though in 1970 the Vietnam Confrontation, toy company Hasbro had rebranded GI Joe as journey figures to diminish the original war theme of G.I. Joe. The name of GI Joe frequently appeared in TV and paperspapers when writers followed war heroes who were spellbound with GI Joe action figures or GI Joe collectibles before they served in the military.

The formation of new GI Joe action figures are influenced by both major army and cultural procedures in the states. GI Joe actions figures have become favorite gifts for boys. A lot of men are obsessed about the collectibles. Like carved gifts, action figures are unique and special when it comes to the present giving.

The inspiration for environmental ethics was the first Earth Day in 1970 when environmentalists started urging philosophers who were involved with environmental groups to do something about environmental ethics. An intellectual climate had developed in the last few years of the 1960s in large part because of the publication of two papers in Science: Lynn White`s “The Historical Roots of our Ecological Crisis” (March 1967) and Garett Hardin`s “The Tragedy of the Commons” (December 1968). Most influential with regard to this kind of thinking, however, was an essay in Aldo Leopold`s A Sand County Almanac, “The Land Ethic,” in which Leopold explicitly claimed that the roots of the ecological crisis were philosophical. Although originally published in 1949, Sand County Almanac became widely available in 1970 in a special Sierra Club/Ballantine edition, which included essays from a second book, Round River.

Most academic activity in the 1970s was spent debating the Lynn White thesis and the tragedy of the commons. These debates were primarily historical, theological, and religious, not philosophical. Throughout most of the decade philosophers sat on the sidelines trying to determine what a field called environmental ethics might look like. The first philosophical conference was organized by William Blackstone at the University of Georgia in 1972. The proceedings were published as Philosophy and Environmental Crisis in 1974, which included Pete Gunter`s first paper on the Big Thicket. In 1972 a book called “Is It Too Late?” A Theology of Ecology, written by John B. Cobb, was published. It was the first single-authored book written by a philosopher, even though the primary focus of the book was theological and religious. In 1973 an Australian philosopher, Richard Routley (now Sylvan), presented a paper at the 15th World Congress of Philosophy “Is There a Need for a New, an Environmental, Ethic?” A year later John Passmore, another Australian, wrote Man’s Responsibility for Nature, in which, reacting to Routley, he argued that there was no need for an environmental ethic at all. Most debates among philosophers until the mid-1980s was focused on refuting Passmore. In 1975 environmental ethics came to the attention of mainstream philosophy with the publication of Holmes Rolston, III`s paper, “Is There an Ecological Ethic?” in Ethics.

Arne Naess, a Norwegian philosopher and the founding editor of the journal Inquiry authored and published a paper in Inquiry “The Shallow and the Deep, Long-range Ecology Movement” in 1973, which was the beginning of the deep ecology movement. Important writers in this movement include George Sessions, Bill DeVall, Warwick Fox, and, in some respects, Max Oelschlaeger.

Throughout the 1970s Inquiry was the primary philosophy journal that dealt with environmental ethics. Environmental ethics was, for the most part, considered a curiosity and mainstream philosophy journals rarely published more than one article per year, if that. Opportunities for publishing dramatically improved in 1979 when Eugene C. Hargrove founded the journal Environmental Ethics. The name of the journal became the name of the field.

The first five years of the journal was spent mostly arguing about rights for nature and the relationship of environmental ethics and animal rights/animal liberation. Rights lost and animal welfare ethics was determined to be a separate field. Animal rights has since developed as a separate field with a separate journal, first, Ethics and Animals, which was later superseded by Between the Species.

Cobb published another book in the early 1980s, The Liberation of Life with co-author Charles Birch. This book took a process philosophy approach in accordance with the philosophy of organism of Alfred North Whitehead. Robin Attfield, a philosopher in Wales, wrote a book called The Ethics of Environmental Concern. It was the first full-length response to Passmore. An anthology of papers, Ethics and the Environment, was edited by Donald Scherer and Tom Attig.

There was a turning point about 1988 when many single-authored books began to come available: Paul Taylor`s Respect for Nature; Holmes Rolston`s Environmental Ethics; Mark Sagoff`s The Economy of the Earth; and Eugene C. Hargrove`s Foundations of Environmental Ethics. J. Baird Callicott created a collection of his papers, In Defence of the Land Ethic. Bryan Norton wrote Why Preserve Natural Diversity? followed more recently by Toward Unity among Environmentalists. A large number of books have been written by Kristin Shrader-Frechette on economics and policy.

In the 1980s a second movement, ecofeminism, developed. Karen Warren is the key philosopher, although the ecofeminism movement involves many thinkers from other fields. It was then followed by a third, social ecology, based on the views of Murray Bookchin. An important link between academics and radical environmentalists was established with the creation of the Canadian deep ecology journal, The Trumpeter. In 1989, Earth Ethics Quarterly was begun as a more popular environmental publication. Originally intended primarily as a reprint publication, now as a publication of the Centre for Respect for Life and Environment, it is focused more on international sustainable development.

The 1990s began with the establishment of the International Society for Environmental Ethics, which was founded largely through the efforts of Laura Westra and Holmes Rolston, III. It now has members throughout the world. In 1992, a second refereed philosophy journal, dedicated to environmental ethics, Environmental Values published its first issue in England.

On the theoretical level, Taylor and Rolston, despite many disagreements, can be regarded as objective nonanthropocentric intrinsic value theorists. Callicott, who follows Aldo Leopold closely, is a subjective nonanthropocentric intrinsic value theorist. Hargrove is considered a weak anthropocentric intrinsic value theorist. Sagoff is very close to this position although he doesn’t talk about intrinsic value much and takes a Kantian rather than an Aristotlian approach. At the far end is Bryan Norton who thought up weak anthropocentrism but wants to replace intrinsic value with a pragmatic conception of value.

A brief history of environmental consciousness in the western world places our views in perspective and provides a context for understanding the maze of related and unrelated thoughts, philosophies, and practices that we call “environmentalism.” Understanding where the questions being asked and analyzed are coming from is essential in environmental analysis: the kinds of questions asked by an environmental group and their interpretation of the results can be vastly different from, for example, a utility, logging company or special interest (ranchers grazing public lands, and so forth).

The term “environmental ethics,” in fact the whole field, is a very recent phenomenum, actually only several decades old, although many particular concerns or philosophical threads have been developing for several centuries. A Professor named Eugene Hargroves began a journal he named Environmental Ethics in the late 1970s in which controversies regarding environmental behaviour and visions could be discussed. This name became an umbrella for a group of strange bedfellows. A controversy had begun in 1974 when an Australian named John Passmore published a book called “Man`s responsibility for nature: ecological problems and western traditions” in which he argued that environmental preservation and concern was inconsistent with western tradition. Robin Attfield replied 1983 in a book entitled “The ethics of environmental concern” by holding that the stewardship tradition was more important than dominion in western thought, and that this is what forms the foundation for environmental ethics. Environmental ethics is a collection of independent ethical generalizations, not a tight, rationally ordered set of rules. Environmental ethics will be a compilation of interrelated independent guidelines – a process field that will be coming together for a long time.

Ethics really flow from peoples perceptions, attitudes and behaviour – as in the case of environmental ethics and animal liberation. Like chess, decision making in life is very perceptual or intuitive – by analogy, there are l) favourite formations (of players or arguments); 2) empirical investigation of these (with maximum and minimum expectations); which leads to a progressive deepening of perspective.

The problem is only dimly perceived in the beginning, but becomes clearer with thought and re-examination. What holds a chess game together is not the rules but the experience the individual player. A grand master at chess sees more on a chessboard in a few seconds than an average player sees in thirty minutes.

Environmental ethics today encompasses a diverse, not necessarily related, anthology including:

1. Animal rights.

2. The Land Ethic.

3. Ecofeminism.

4. Deep Ecology.

5. Shallow Ecology.

6. The rights of rocks, and so forth.

8. Bioethics.

Bioethics could be defined as the study of ethical issues and decision-making associated with the use of living organisms and medicine. It includes both medical ethics and environmental ethics. Rather than defining a correct decision it is about the process of decision-making balancing different benefits, risks and duties. The word “bioethics” was first used in 1970, however, the concept of

                         Who Has The Answer To Stop Crime?

Over the years, the City of St. Louis has had multiple problems with crime. The St. Louis Federal Investigation Agency had reviewed St. Louis Crime Statistic Reports, and learned that the city is mad. The crime percentage in St. Louis is greater than any other city in the United States. Crime has given St. Louis a horrible name.

There are probably more than 20,000 cities surrounding the United States. Out of 20 thousand cities, when it comes to crime, St. Louis had proven to be most violent and treacherous. The city is filled with a bunch of people who continually double cross one another. Now the entire world can see that St. Louis is a city not to be played with. This city is off the chain, and I now see why mothers are afraid to take their children to the neighborhood playground.

St. Louis was once ranked #1 for crimes. I do not yet know the city’s ranking in 2010, but I am sure it is pretty high. When a city is ranked #1 for crimes, that means, all types of felonies and misdemeanors have been performed throughout it. Also, a city posted number one for crimes is a place where much foul play has been in session.

The North side, the Southside, the Westside, and the Eastside have become fields of war. How can it be safe, when all four sides of a city is filled with crime? When all four sides of a city is active in crime, there is nowhere to run, nor is there a place to find refuge.  

In these last and evil days, people are claiming spots as their territory. Nothing in the area is owned by them, but they claim it, as if it has been purchased by them. They even call it “My Turf”. It has to be something from within that makes people claim what they do not own.

Many innocent people have been victimized. The innocent are slain every day. Some people woke one morning feeling good about life. The day was normal, and perhaps it was payday. They walked out the front door, with thoughts on receiving an earned paycheck. Then, all of a sudden, someone brought crime into an innocent person’s presence. As this innocent person was about to get inside the car, he got shot and robbed. It is amazing how a crime can mess up a person’s life.

Crime has become St. Louis burden and affliction. People are taking on yokes by their own strength. Normally, human beings are subjects of obtaining burdens and afflictions. But St. Louis, which is a city, has conceived that same damaging effect. The body of Jesus suffered much affliction from crime led people, and St. Louis is suffering badly from the same movement (crime committing). If St. Louis had a mind to think for itself, its thoughts would be filled with misery all day long. All the times, St. Louis would have horrible anxiety attacks. Since St. Louis is a city, and cannot think for itself, it knows nothing about emotions and feelings. The longer people allow crime to keep its focus, the greater the burden and affliction St. Louis will feel.

In every city, people are the ones who commit crimes. When people hearts and minds are loyal to “self pleasure”, they do whatever it takes to get a fulfillment. They never realize that their lives are operating from evil mental misconduct. They thought about it; they planned it; and then pursued it, until reaching success.

From all of the crime practicing done in St. Louis, the people have become lawbreaking professionals. Crime committing in St. Louis has become a hobby to the people. People commit crime as if it is a sport. Their energy should be used on the basketball court, but they use it to steal, rob, and commit assaults.

Me, Brian Irons, wrote a book explaining why people commit crimes. In addition, the book also speaks about how and why my life got involved in committing crimes. My book is titled, “I Did Not Know”. Not only does this book explain why people commit crimes, but it also teaches which part of the Intelligent Human Brain any drug will control. It only takes a quick surge of mental empowerment to commit crimes, and my book dominantly teaches on that subject. If you want to read a book about drugs, the I Did Not Know is the one for you. My book exposes a wide range of knowledge about substance abuse, as well as teaching readers about the mental body (the brain).

The “I Did Not Know” book is written, to teach people how to disconnect their hearts and minds from the attachment of crime. When people’s hearts and minds have become attached to committing crimes, it is because their thoughts are filled with the persuasion of wickedness. Not only that, but when people commit crimes, their bodies become flesh of evil. The mind plots on ways to commit crimes; the heart sets to do it; the feet takes you to the place, and the hands reach out to make it a successful.

In order for a person to be detached from wickedness, it is going to take spiritual power to do something like that. The more crimes a person commits, the stronger the power of wickedness becomes. 1+1 is 2, and 2+2 is 4. In the same additional sense, wickedness + living inside a person’s body, equals a lawbreaking maneuver. If you have ever committed a crime or broken the law, you have performed a work of wickedness. In order to bring wickedness and crime to a state of halt, a solution must be found. 

Crime is like science, because it takes a formula to solve its problem. Crime is like math, because, in St. Louis, Missouri, its atmosphere is filled with the division of wickedness. Crime is like biology, because it takes true mental (spiritual) power to disjoint it from the anatomy. Crime is like gym, because people exercise (move) their bodies when performing the act. Nevertheless, if a math problem can to be solved, and in science there is a formula, then wickedness needs an equation.  

There is an equation (solution) to solving wickedness, but the people need to put their minds together, and conjure up a tactic. A world of people continually search ways to earn a higher pay, but will not seek the solution for minimizing these crimes. 

People attend school for years. They try earning the highest certificate there is. They want their rankings to arise above all. They know the greater the degree, the better the pay. All week long, people faithfully attend school, show up for work, but no one wants to work a work putting an end to this crime.

The book I’ve written is not the ultimate answer or the only solution to preventing crimes from being committed; however, God has caused it to be a link to the answer. If you want to bring crime to a minimum, my testimony needs its throne.

Every now and then, my immune system catches a “cold”. I sometimes cough and sneeze, when catching a cold. Before the cold gets any worst, I go get a bottle of Nyquil, and take a cap size of that. Nyquil is my body’s solution for the healing.

St. Louis is a sick place, and it needs a dose of medicine. To most crime committers, it seems to be a mystery, because they do not know why they commit crimes. They think they are committing crimes to feed or satisfy their mental habit, which is zealously true, but it is much deeper than mental addictions. The people’s hearts and minds need medicine, and a dose should be taken today. The blood of Jesus is that medicine.

The solution to stopping these crimes is not found in the police calls, or in the conviction from the law. The law has neither the solution, nor the answer to stopping these crimes. When a crime is being committed, usually, the police force is called upon. When the police arrive on the scene, the crime that was being committed is suddenly put on pause. Once the police officers leave the scene, crime activity immediately goes back into play mode.  

By now, every single last one of us knows what the law says. For years and years, the laws have been rehearsed into our ears. However, we still break laws anyway. The law and commandment says, “Thou shalt not steal“, but guess what, people commit theft anyway. The law and commandment says, “Thou shall not bear false witness“, but people lie on one another anyway. The commandment says, “Thou shalt not commit adultery“”, but we have sex with other people’s spouses anyway. The law says, “No Trespassing“, but we break an entry anyway. Whatever the law commands us “not to do”; we end up do it anyway. We don’t even care what the law says. The spoken word of the law goes in one ear and out the other.

It takes true power to stop the world of people from breaking the law. When it comes to the solution to stopping crimes, the law has it not, and neither is it in the power of man. The law is filled with a bunch of words, and it is weak at providing personal freedom. The law is fragile, because anyone can break it. The law is frail, because anyone can knock it over.

Although, the law is frail, it is still famous, because everyone knows about it. The law will never give the amplified power to stop crimes from being committed. The law was never meant to be your friend, because when it is all said and done, the law will either send you to prison forever, or discern a date for you to sit in the electric chair. Once a person breaks the law, and is caught doing so, the law comes alive, and chooses one of its terms to condemn. When a person commits a crime, and a judgment has taken place, the law has just proved its power. The law only has the power to pronounce judgments on people’s lives. People are caught breaking laws every single day. Therefore, people are judged and sent to prison every day, too.  

Well, let me get to the base point in this story, because time is winding down. The hands on the clock go round and round and I must tell

Vita Coco 100 Pure Coconut Water 11.2 Ounce Containers Pack of 12

Vita Coco 100 Pure Coconut Water 11.2 Ounce Containers Pack of 12
Save on Vita Coco 100 Pure Coconut Water 11.2 Ounce Containers Pack of 12. Free Shipping, Order Now!

You can Buy Vita Coco 100 Pure Coconut Water 11.2 Ounce Containers Pack of 12 In Stock. Vita Coco 100 Pure Coconut Water 11.2 Ounce Containers Pack of 12 Shops or Buy Online – At Lowest Pirce you Save BIG!

Do not know what it is, but it is a dry aftertaste. Can be strengthened, ascorbic acid (super high in vitamin C, ahem !!!).

Yes! we have “Vita Coco 100 Pure Coconut Water 11.2 Ounce Containers Pack of 12″. You can Buy Vita Coco 100 Pure Coconut Water 11.2 Ounce Containers Pack of 12 In Stock. Lowest Prices on Vita Coco 100 Pure Coconut Water 11.2 Ounce Containers Pack of 12 Shops & Purchase Online – Buy today you Save BIG

AMAZING

This product is actually the best drink I have tried in a long time. Currently, my fridge is stocked with every flavor, and I drink half a bottle before I run and the rest of the bottle after. It has made me so much more energized for my workouts and has helped me feel less sore afterwards. I have also substituted soda with Vita Coco in my mixed drinks that I have before I go out. Its been the most versatile thing in my fridge, and I don’t need any other drink (besides water!). I HIGHLY suggest this to anyone who wants a healthy, yummy substitute for soda and other unhealthy drinks!
Vita coco is the best out there!

I’m a huge fan of Vita coco and here’s why: 
- It tastes so good. A huge fan of the taste, especially the original flavor and the pineapple one. 
- All the health benefits. Tons of electrolytes and nutrients, low calories 
- Helps you lose weight! Def helped me shed a few pounds without condemning myself to a boring only-drink-water to lose weight deal 
- All natural, unlike other sports drinks like Gatorade. 
- Also really good for dealing with hangovers! 

I’ve tried Zico too and while it’s not bad, it does have a bunch of extra stuff in it, especially since Coke took control of it. The quality has dropped in my opinion. 

My entire family and I drink tons of Vita Coco everyday and whole-heartedly recommend it to everyone out there! 
Get in the Coco craze.
Odd dry sensation on tongue

Not sure what it is but there’s a dry aftertaste. Could be the fortified ascorbic acid (super high vitamin c content, ahem!!!).
Vita Coco – Electrolyte and potassium rich, no added sugar

This product also comes in 34-ounce boxes (package of 6) Vita Coco 100% Pure Coconut Water, 34-Ounce Boxes (Pack of 6) The single-servings have 11.1 ounces Vita Coco 100% Pure Coconut Water, 11.2-Ounce Containers (Pack of 12), while the 34-ounce carton says it has four servings of 8.5 ounces each. 

This is 100% pure natural coconut water, with no added sugar. Each 11.1-ounce serving has 60 calories, 0 grams of any kind of fat, 40mg sodium, 680mg potassium, 15g total carb (0g fiber, 15g naturally-occurring sugars, none added), and 0 grams protein. Percentages based on a 2000-calorie diet, it has 230% Vitamin C, 5% Calcium, 5% Phosphorous, 10% Magnesium. 

This means that Vita Coco 100% pure coconut water has more electrolytes, with 15 times more potassium, than leading sports drinks, without the added sugars and/or artificial sweeteners and other added ingredients (dyes, etc.) 

It gives excellent hydration. My only regret is that I didn’t find Vita Coco before I did a 26.2-mile marathon back in 2002. I still take frequent walks, and with Vita Coco, I never cramp. 

I have noticed that my blood is clotting better/wounds are healing more quickly. I occasionally get small scratches from my cat, and have gotten various scratches from shrubbery encountered on my walks, and recently, a sharp knife got the better of me and I cut my fingertip. It was during these recent instances that I noticed the faster healing time and better blood clotting. I monitor my body’s processes closely and can attribute these improvements, at least in large part, to consuming coconut water. 

Highly recommended! I’m on Amazon’s “Subscribe & Save” with this product. I find that my husband and I use more of this in the summer (when we are more active outdoors) than in the winter, and Subscribe & Save allows me to add more or order less on certain shipments.

Read More About Vita Coco 100% Pure Coconut Water, 11.2-Ounce Containers (Pack of 12)

Best buy for “Vita Coco 100 Pure Coconut Water 11.2 Ounce Containers Pack of 12″, Lowest Price Vita Coco 100 Pure Coconut Water 11.2 Ounce Containers Pack of 12 + Free shipping. Don’t miss Vita Coco 100 Pure Coconut Water 11.2 Ounce Containers Pack of 12, Cheapest Vita Coco 100 Pure Coconut Water 11.2 Ounce Containers Pack of 12Buy Online – Get it Now!

Copyright © 2009 All rights reserved.

We associated with Amazon.com